Prejudice -- Attitude (affective evaluation)
Discrimination-- Action
- Stereotype: cognitive representation that associates a social group with a specific attribute(s) in an oversimplified way
- Don't Agree with Book's definition: Stereotype = belief
- Prejudice : unjustified negative attitude toward anyone of a particular social group
- Cognitive Sources of Stereotypes
- Social categorization- classifying persons into groups
- Grouping occurs automatically and naturally (heuristic thinking)
- Snap judgments happens inevitably
- Does harm to social relationships= problem ; Undermine inevitability = solution
- groups = gender, race, occupation etc.
- In-group/Out-group categorization - Identification, or lack of, with a group
- In group = group you're in; Out group = group you're not in
- Us vs Them judgment
- Social priming makes one group more usable in particular situations
- Us/Them Biases
- Outgroup homogeneity bias - People of one outgroup are more similar than your ingroup
- "They're all alike" "They all look alike"
- Ingroup-outgroup bias - hold less favorable views of outgroups than ingroups
- Minimal Group Procedure
- Assigned to group on trivial criteria
- blue-eyed people, tails people etc.
- Rate both groups' personality
- Result: Bias toward fellow group members
- Social Identity theory
- All have basic need to maintain/enhance self-esteem (SE)
- Self-esteem influenced by Personal and Social IDs
- Personal - individual accomplishments
- Social - social group's accomplishments
- Motivated evaluate ingroups more positively than outgroups
- Social Identity research
- Ingroup bias experience----> increased SE
- positive time with ingroup, more SE
- SE threat------> increased ingroup bias
- fail at something, want group to succeed even more to increase SE
- Lower status groups show more ingroup bias
- low SE, more ingroup biasing
- Birging
- BIRG - Basking In Reflected Glory
- football game study - football game won, much more university colors worn
- Allport and Postman (1947)
- Picture of Black man near White man holding razor shown to white subjects
- Telephone game played; 6th subject desrcibes scene
- Results: Over half the sessions Black man holding the razor
- Racial Bias (Ingroup-outgroup Bias)
- Bargh, Chen, and Burrows (1997)
- Scrambled sentence task
- Two conditions:
- Elderly stereotype - grey, wise, wrinkle, bingo
- Control- thirsty, clean, private
- Timed as walking down hall
- Elderly stereotype primed = take longer to walk
- Trivial Stereotype findings
- NBA fouls - more called against black players
- Baseball - mixed race pitcher/umpire more likely to call ball
- Stereotype threat - self-confirming fear of validating stereotype
- How it works
- Stereotyped group knows stereotype
- In potential confirming situation, members become anxious
- Anxiety interferes with optimal functioning ends up confirming stereotype
- Stereotype + Anxiety = Stereotyped Behavior
- Like Self-fulfilling prophecy
- Spencer and Steele (1997)
- Woman/men (equal math ability) told given math test
- 2 conditions
- Stereotype threat - noted woman usually underperform
- Control - noted both groups similar
- Results:
- Stereotype condition: M = 27 W = 7
- Control condition: M = 18 W= 17
- Steele and Aronson (1995)
- Whites/Blacks told take SAT-like test
- 2 Conditions:
- Stereotype threat - report race
- Control - no race report
- Results out of 20
- Stereotype Condition: Black = 7.3 White = 9.8
- Control: Black = 9.1 White = 7.3
- Princeton Trilogy [Optimistic position: Stereotypes Changing] (African American traits)
- Superstitious: from 84% to 13%
- Lazy : from 75% to 26%
- Ignorant: from 38% to 11%
- Duncan, 1976 [Pessimistic position: Stereotypes Same]
- Two men conversing, mild spat, one lightly pushes the other
- Conditions: White pushing Black ; Black pushing White
- Question: Is the push playful or violent
- Results(% thought Violent): White = 13% Black = 73%
- Take home message: Duncan thought that people are subconsciously prejudiced as shown in responses
- Devine's (1989) Dissociation Model
- Stereotypes and Beliefs = different cognitive structures
- Stereotypes = well-known associations that you may/may not believe
- Beliefs = endorsements which you strongly support
- Black stereotype can be Automatically activated
- Stereotype Socialized frequently, becomes part of natural cognitive process
- Behavior for low and high prejudice based on this unless checked (for low prejudice)
Awareof process -----> Behavior Consistent with Prejudice- Time and Motivation needed for Awareness and Change
- High prejudice = Stereotypes and Beliefs Overlap
- Prejudice reduction = Long, difficult process
- Adopting Non-prejudice belief
- Aware of Stereotype Activation
- Guilt of prejudice-behavior drives you to not let this happen
- Devine and Elliot, 1995
- Check adjectives (princeton trilogy) representing Black stereotype
- Check adjectives you believe
- Prejudice level measured
- Results:
- Low Prejudice- Stereotypes = prejudiced; Beliefs = Non-prejudiced
- High Prejudice- Stereotypes = prejudiced; Beliefs = prejudiced
- Message: Stereotype Discrepant from Belief
- Devine (1989)
- Prejudice level measured
- Shown brief flashes- 2 conditions
- Stereotype activation flash
- Control flash
- Rate ambiguous person's hostility
- Results (0-10):
- Stereotype activated = 7.52
- Control = 6.87
- No difference for high/low prejudice = Both affected by Stereotype Activation
- Beliefs don't matter; Activate stereotype, behavior will be accordingly
- Chen and Bargh (1997 [Actual Behavior]
- Brief flashes, asked left/right
- 2 Conditions
- Black face subliminally shown
- White face subliminally shown
- Played verbal game against same-race person; hostility coded
- Results (1-7 scale):
- Black face- 3.1
- White face- 2.7
- Self-Perpetuating Nature of Stereotypes
- Subtyping- reacting to people who deviate from a stereotype via creating a sub-stereotype group that's an exception to the stereotype
- keeps stereotype intact
- make a group exceptional to stereotype
- "I'm not prejudiced; Some of my best friends are black"
- Illusory Correlations- overestimating strength of relationship of two unusual events
- Majority groups Few Interactions w/ Minority groups (distinctive event)
- Distinctive Events = Negative events
- Overestimate Co-occurrence of Distinctive Events
- Ultimate Attribution Error- tendency to attribute Behavior of Minority member Negative = Disposition; Positive = Situation
- Stereotype Suppression Effects- Stop Suppression--->Stereotype Rebounds
- intentional avoidance of topic---->stop avoidance------> think about topic
- Macrae study (1994)
- Photo of skinhead shown; write paragraph about day in person's life
- 2 Conditions
- Suppression - told don't use stereotypes
- Control - no instructions
- Meet skinhead; Sit near skinhead; Measure distance
- Results 1-9 writing task; 1-7 distance
- writing task
- suppression = 5.58
- control = 6.83
- distance
- suppression = 5.25
- control = 4.41
No comments:
Post a Comment