Monday, February 27, 2012

2/27-2/29: Social Psychology- Biases and Heuristics (chapter 3 Myers)

Social Cognition

  • Social Cognition- applying cognitive psychology  to social world
    • how we process info on the social world; involves other people
    • what factors of the situation affect an average person's behavior
Assumptions about Social Cognition

  • Motivated to Make Sense
    • via seeing patterns in the social world
  • World loaded with Info
    • far more info than you can process; everything = info
    • accustomed to process info in specific way
  • Limited Capacity
    • brains have limits that incoming info cannot be fully processed
  • Cognitive Miser
    • greatly oversimplify info and process as much as needed
    • assumption and empirically based
3 types of Simplification Strategies

  • Dispositional Inference Biases
  • Confirmatory Biases
  • Cognitive Heuristics
Dispositional inference biases
  • Dispositional inference- behavior seen as caused by persons' personality
    • one instance of a person leads you to define that behavior by their personality
      • person's sad but you don't know that they failed an exam but you think that that's their personality
    • first pass
  • Fundamental attribution error- bias toward person-based inferences
Jones and Harris (1967)

  • Had to write pro/anti Castro essays
  • Received free/forced choice manipulation
    • free to write pro- group A
    • free to write anti- group B
    • forced to write pro- group C
    • forced to write anti- group D
  • Rated debater's actual attitude toward Castro
  • Results: Anti  0-100  Pro
    • Group A  = 58
    • Group B = 22
    • Group C = 42
    • Group D = 22
  • Take-home lesson
    • Actor- observer bias
  • Actor-observer bias: behavior of others due to personality; my behavior due to situation
    • situation affects your behavior but everyone else's behavior is their personality
    • represented in language
  • Confirmatory Bias: interpret, seek, and create info that verifies existing beliefs
    • Interpret
    • Seek
    • Create
  • Darley and Gross (1983)
    • Experiment associated with Confirmatory bias
    • girl from background (told rich/ told poor) does task on video
    • Results: 
      • high expectation/no watch =  grade 4.2
      • low expectation/no watch = 3.9
      • high expectation/ watch = 4.8
      • low expectation/ watch = 3.5
    • Take home lesson
      • Expectation drives people's perception
  • Synder and Swan (1978) 
    • interviewer/interviewee roles
    • select list of possible questions
    • before selection, subjects told the other was extrovert/introvert
    • Results:
      • Extravert: chose extravert-oriented questions ( how do you liven up party?)
      • Intravert condition: chose introvert- oriented questions (have you felt left out?)
  • Self-fulfilling prophesy: inaccurate expectation leads to expectation-consistent behavior
    • you think person's going to act in specific way, you behave in a way that would make them respond that way
  • Synder, Tanke, and Bersheid (1977) [self-fulfilling prophesy]
    • phone conversation with woman
    • shown pic of attractive/unattractive partner
      • pics not of subjects
    • Females' responses coded for openness and warmth
    • Result
      • 'attractive' - more open and warm response 
Cognitive Heuristic
  • Cognitive heuristic - mental shortcut
    • makes impressions and judgments
  • Outline
    • Anchoring and adjustment heuristic
    • Representativeness heuristic
    • Availability heuristic
    • Straightness heuristic
  • Anchoring and Adjustment heuristic- anchor/begin from rough estimate, then adjust
    • setting the bar = anchor; working up or down from bar = adjustment
    • anchor = often ourselves
    • ex: roommate offers blind date with girl who looks like jessica alba
      • anchor = jessica alba adjustment = girl's looks
      • disappointment with her not comparing then leads to self-fulfilling prophecy
    • ex: roommate says ellen is smart
      • anchor = my own intelligence  adjustment = her actual intelligence
  • Representative heuristic- likelihood judgments are based on matching a stereotype
    • Conjunction error- combo of two events are thought to be more likely than two independent events
      • in reality it is the same probability
    • ex: outgoing extravert with love of books
      • probability of wanting to become engineering major
      • probability of wanting to become engineering major then switching to journalism
        • this one seems to have bigger chance even though it really does not
    • Gambler's Fallacy- thinking that something is due after not being there when in reality the same probability for the same hand exists every time
    • Hot Hand phenomena- "on a roll" basket after basket ; doesn't exist
      • ex: HH not present on stats of NBA players
  • Availability heuristic- likelihood estimates based on how quickly instances come to mind
    • pops to mind quicker = more common
    • instance thought about more, perceived to be prevalent
    • False Consensus effect- overestimate others' agreeing to our opinions
  • Straightness heuristic- tendency to "tidy up" untidy realities to achieve "prettier picture"
    • want to make world simpler/more straightforward than is
  • Unconscious bias
    • people are generally unaware of their biases

    Tuesday, February 21, 2012

    Review Session: Exam One

    • Criticisms of the Big 5
      • merely descriptive
      • doesn't explain behaviors
    • Traits/Types
      • HOW are people different
      • Type
        • either one or the other
          • friendly or not
      • Trait
        • varying dimensions
        • little/extremely/just friendly
    • Needs/Motives
      • WHY people are different
      • Nomothetic Approach (Cattell)
        • set of traits that apply to everyone in same way
      • Idiographic Approach (Allport)
        • look at individual in depth and applies to just you uniquely
        • uses
          • Cardinal traits
          • Central traits
          • Secondary traits
      • BIS/BAS Distinction
        • BIS
          • anxiety and impulsivity proneness
          • avoidance approach
          • brake
        • BAS
          • gas pedal
          • reward approach
          • dopamine plays important part in behavior
      • Aggregation
        • look at behavior in variety of situations
      • Galen's 4 Temperament Humors
        • Choleric
        • Sanguine
        • Melancholic
        • Phlegmatic
      • Implicit motive
        • unconscious
        • measure
          • TAT projection
            • Murray
      • Self-attributed motive
        • aware of it conscious of it
      • Personology
        • idiographic method of studying people
      • Dynamic Interactionism
        • Proactive
          • choose situation
        • Evocative
          • presence unintentionally alters situation
            • people just act differently when you're there
        • Manipulation
          • intentionally change situation
            • act certain way
      • Cattell
        • bottom-up
          • starts with evidence and work material and work to theory
        • criticism
          • overuse of factor analysis
          • published too much
      • Eysenck
        • top-down
          • start with theory and work forward
      • Gray
        • eysenck's introversion, extroversion
          • Introversion = High BIS Low BAS
          • Extroversion = High BAS Low BIS
        • eysenck's stability, instability
          • Instability = High BIS and BAS
          • Stability = Low BIS and BAS
      • Objective/Subjective Reality
        • objective- how things really are = Alpha Press
        • subjective- how you perceive them to be = Beta Press
      • Neuroticism
        • Amgydala = emotion center of brain
      • Body Consciousness
        • motive theory
        • high = correlation between implicit and self attributed motives
      • 3 Camps response to Mischel
        • Defend Traits
        • Situationism
        • Dynamic Interactionism
      • Aggregation
        • used by Defend Traits group
        • multiple choice exam
          • one wrong question doesn't reflect your understanding of the material
      • Factor Analysis
        • statistical method of taking traits and condensing them into smaller groups
        • used by
          • Cattell
      • Family Method vs Twin Method
        • family- looked at family tree
          • genetic link
        • twins- MZ twins compared to DZ twins

        Wednesday, February 15, 2012

        Study Guide Exam 1

        • Type Theorists
          • Hippocrates
          • Galen
          • Sheldon
        • Trait Theorists
          • Allport
          • Cattell
          • Eysenck
        • Need/Motive Theorists
          • Murray
          • Zuckerman
          • McClellan
          • Gray
          • Mischel  
        • Theories, Approaches, and Needs
          • Hippocrates' four humors
          • Galen's humor theory of temperament 
          • Sheldon's Somatotypes
          • 3 Kinds of Traits- Allport
            • Cardinal
            • Central
            • Secondary
          • Nomothetic approach
            • applies to everyone
            • same dimensions for everyone
          • Idiographic approach
            • applies to you uniquely
            • dimensions can overlap
          • 16 Dimensions aka 16PF- Cattell
          • Big 2: Extraversion and Stability - Eysenck
          • The Big Five Trait theory (O.C.E.A.N.)
            • Criticisms and Limitations of the Big 5 model
          •  Personology- idiographic Murray
          • Viscerogenic needs- Murray
            • biological
          • Psychogenic Needs- Murray
            • psychological
          • Press
            • Alpha
            • Beta
          • Motive
            • Implicit
            • Self-Attributed
          • Biological theories
            • Phrenology
            • Eyesenck's  argument:
              • consistency over time
              • same pattern-different culture
              • genetics
            • I-E: (ARAS)
              • Optimal Cortical Arousal
              • stimulus difference between intro/extroverts
            • S-I: visceral brain
              • Emotion Generator
                • comprised of hippocampus, amygdala , and other sections
                • I- low threshold of activation in visceral brain
                • S- high threshold
            • S-I results magnifies I-E
          • Gray's two dimensions of personality- BIS and BAS
            • Anxiety Proneness 
              • BIS
            • Impulsivity
              • BAS
          • Eyesenk's dimensions stated in terms of BIS and BAS
            • Extrovert- high BAS/ low BIS
            • Introvert- high BIS/ low BAS
            • Unstable- high BAS/BIS
            • Stable- low BAS/ BIS
          • Gray on psychopathology
            • strong BIS/weak BAS- phobias
            • strong BAS/ weak BIS- antisocial behavior
          • Behavioral Genetics methods
            • Family method
            • Twin method
            • Combo of Twin and Adoption method
            • Environment Sharing method


        • Mischel's Critique
        • Response Groups to Mischel's Critique
          • Defend Traits
          • Situationism
          • Dynamic Interactionism


          • Hippocrates
            • laid groundwork for 1st theory of personality
            • Hippocrates' four humors
              • Blood
              • Black bile
              • Yellow bile
              • Phlegm
                • Believed an excess of one of these humors would elicit a specific disease
          • Galen
            • Galen's humor theory of temperament
              • Sanguine (excess blood): forceful, direct, courageous
              • Melancholic (excess black bile): brooding, moody, withdrawn
              • Choleric (excess yellow bile): irritable, bitter, resentful
              • Phlegmatic  (excess phlegm): weak, fragile, indecisive
            • temperament theory tends to have a ring of truth but oversimplistic
          • Sheldon
            • Sheldon's Somatotypes
              • Endomorphy: plumb; 7,1,1 (max); relaxed, easygoing, lovers of creature comfort
              • Mesomorhpy: muscular; 1,7,1(max); bold, assertive, action-oriented
              • Ectomorphy: frail; 1,1,7(max); inhibited, restrained, apprehensive 
            • low-high scale of 1-7 for all three types
          • Gordon Allport
            • his definition of Trait
              • a neuropsychic structure having the capacity to render many stimuli functionally equivalent, and to initiate and guide equivalent (meaningfully consistent) forms of adaptive and expressive behavior
            • 3 Kinds of Traits
              • Cardinal
                • single disposition that dominates everything a person does including personality
                •  single descriptive adjective for person
                • uncommon
              • Central
                • best descriptor of personality
                • sample of 3-10 traits for one person
                  • 18,000 characteristics in all
                • multiple adjectives for person
                • would show up in letter of recommendation
              • Secondary
                • influences behavior only in certain limited settings
                • situation specific tendencies
                  • ex: concert preference, conference behavior
              • would probably not show up in letter of recommendation
          • Rayman Cattell 
            • Trait as "building block"
            • Search for basic traits
            • Sought "periodic table"
            • Used factor analysis
            • Disposition favored
            • Cattell = Mr. Nomothetic 
            • Multiple Data Sources 
              • L data, Q- data, T- data
            • 16 Dimensions 
                • Reserved vs Outgoing
                • Less Intelligent vs More Intelligent
                • Emotional vs Stable
                • Humble vs Assertive
                • Sober vs Happy-go-lucky
                • Expedient vs Conscientious
                • Shy vs Venturesome
                • Tough-minded vs Tender-minded
                • Trusting vs Suspicious
                • Practical vs Imaginative
                • Forthright vs Shrewd
                • Placid vs Apprehensive
                • Conservative vs Experimenting
                • Group-tied vs Self-sufficient
                • Casual vs Controlled
                • Relaxed vs Tense
          • Eysenck's two basic dimensions
            • Introversion- Extroversion
            • Stability- Instability
            • Meta Trait level
              • 5 categories
                • Sociability
                • Impulsiveness
                • Activity
                • Liveliness
                • Excitability
          • Eysenck versus Cattell
            • What are the foundational elements of personality?
              • Eysenck: "top-down"
                • started with Galen's idea and worked his way down with the data
              • Cattell: "bottom-up"
            • Basic Traits
              • Eysenck: two
                • wanted simplest possible model, went for meta-traits
                • narrowed Cattell's model
              • Cattell: sixteen
          • The Big Five(and facets) - Trait theory (O.C.E.A.N.)
            • Extraversion
              • Sociable- Retiring
              • Fun loving- Sober
              • Affectionate- Reserved
              • Friendly- Aloof
              • Spontaneous- Inhibited
              • Talkative - Quiet
            • Neuroticism
              • Worrying- Calm
              • Nervous- At ease
              • High-strung - Relaxed
              • Insecure- Secure
              • Self-Pitying - Self-satisfied
              • Vulnerable- Hardy
            • Openness to Experience
              • Original- Conventional
              • Imaginative- Down to earth
              • Creative- Uncreative
              • Broad interests- Narrow interests
              • Complex- Simple
              • Curious - Incurious
            • Agreeableness
              • Good natured- Irritable
              • Soft hearted- Ruthless
              • Courteous - Rude
              • Forgiving - Vengeful
              • Sympathetic - Callous
              • Agreeable - Disagreeable
            • Conscientiousness
              • Conscientious - Negligent
              • Careful- Careless
              • Reliable- Undependable
              • Well-organized - Disorganized
              • Self-disciplined - Weak-willed
              • Persevering - Quitting 
          • Sources of Evidence for the Big 5
            • Factor analyses of trait terms in language
            • Factor analyses of self-report data
              • created questionnaires result in the Big 5
            • Factor analyses of observer judgments
          • Are the Big 5 linked to behavior?
            • Yes, based on:
              • Agreement between self ratings and observers(e.g. informant) ratings
                • 1 = high +,+  0= no correlation -1= low +,-
              • Studies of "behavioral residue"
                • check organization of office, bedroom, dorm room etc.
          • Criticisms and Limitations of the Big 5 model
            • "The Big Five, plus or minus two"
              • 5 traits is the norm but people are shown to have less or more
            • Openness
              • what exactly is it, the source?
            • Over reliance on factor analysis
            • Focus on traits or meta traits?
          • Henry Murray 
            • Introduced Personology
              • definition- scientific study of a whole person from an idiographic perspective
              • psychodynamic 
            • Introduced elaborate new set of terms 
            • Need
              • Components
                • Grounded in the brain
                  • organizes the way you think, feel
                • Causal
                  • causes you to act in a certain way
                • Tension-reduction
                  • influences you to rid/meet some tension until it's satisfied
            • Two Types of Needs
              • Viscerogenic needs
                • biological needs
                • involve physical satisfactions
                • list; see BB for highlighted ones
            • Psychogenic Needs
                • Psychological desires
                • involve mental or emotional satisfactions
                • most important
                • largely unconscious
                  • no access to them; you just feel them when they arise
                • all possess all 27, but some stronger 
            • Press
              • definition- tendency in the environment to facilitate or obstruct the expression of a need
                • ex: presence of friends in the library = press for affiliation
              • Two types
                • Alpha Press- objective reality
                  • what's happened
                • Beta Press- subjective interpretation

            • Rationale behind the TAT- by Murray 
          • McClelland
            • Driving Motives
              • picked the following three driving emotions
                • Achievement, Affiliation, Power
            • Personology- study of total personality of individuals
            • Motive
              • Implicit
                • unconscious
                • measured with TAT
              • Self-Attributed
                • conscious
          • Eyesenck argument for relation between biology and individual differences
            • Consistency over time
              • has to be something stable in a person to maintain personality
                • biology is the only stable thing
            • Same Pattern - Different Cultures
              • same pattern of traits keeps showing up across cultures
              • cross-culture similarities would not be possible unless there was some biological catalyst
            • Genetics
              • some personality differences and similarities, ex/introvert, are genetically grounded
              • Eyesenck's estimate of bio-portion of personality: 2/3
          • Stimulus
            • Introverts- stimulus shy
              • already have a high level of arousal; too much stimulation shoots them over the Optimal
            • Extroverts- stimulus hungry
              • already have low level of arousal; needs much stimulation to reach optimal level
          • I-E: ascending reticular activating system (ARAS)
            • connects the spinal cord to the area of brain which regulates general arousal
          • Typical Level
            • Higher for Introverts than Extroverts
            • Optimal Cortical Arousal
              • everyone craves this set point
          • Gray's two dimensions of personality
            • Anxiety Proneness and Impulsivity
            • grounded in Brain
            • Anxiety Proneness
              • Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS)
                • septo-hippocampal system
                • activated by
                  • punishment stimuli
                  • absence of desired reward
                  • fear stimuli
                  • novel stimuli
              • BIS activation
                • Behavioral effects
                  • don't engage quickly in novel situations
                • Cognitive effects
                  • looking for ,to avoid, problems in environment
                • Affective effects
                  • feels fear 
            • Impulsivity: BAS
              • dopaminergic pathways
                • dopamine
              • activated by
                • reward stimuli
                • escape
              • BAS activation
                • Behavioral effects
                  • looking forward to approach something/someone to obtain rewards
                • Affecive effects
                  • feel hope
              • combination of Anxiety proneness and Impulsivity leads to real variable
                • score on one does not affect score on the other
          • Eyesenk's dimensions stated in terms of BIS and BAS (*bold= high score)
            • I-E
              • Extrovert- high BAS/ low BIS
                • high to approach and low to avoid
              • Introvert- high BIS/ low BAS
                • high to avoid and low to approach
            • S-I
              • Unstablehigh BAS/low BIS
                • high in approach and avoidance
              • Stablelow BAS/ low BIS
                • low in approach and avoidance
          • Gray on psychopathology
            • strong BIS/weak BAS- phobias
            • strong BAS/ weak BIS- antisocial behavior


            • Behavioral Genetics methods


              • Family Method
                • Weakness
                  • does not take nurture into account at all, making it unreliable
              • Twin Method
                • Weakness
                  • environment is not the same for identical and nonidentical twins
              • Combination of Twin and Adoption Methods
                • (weakness)- De-identification: when you are really similar to another, you try to differentiate yourself


                • 40% differences = Genetics


                • Environmental Variation (siblings primarily)
                  • Shared Environment
                    • House, Class, etc.
                    • increasing similarities
                    • personality variance 5%


                  • Nonshared Environment
                    • An Accident, Birth Order, Different Relationships etc.
                    • increasing differences
                    • personality variance 35%


                  • MZ Twins
                    • NOT AFFECTED EITHER WAY
                    • Correlation between nonshared and shared is 0


              • Mischel's Critique (1968)
                • Proposals on Personality
                  • Traits do NOT exist
                  •  more apparent than real
                  • comprised of Nature and Nurture
                • Wrote book Personality and Assessment


                • If traits-----consistency
                  • situation wouldn't matter
                    • anxious people would be anxious everywhere, all the time


                • Little Consistency
                  • More apparent than real


                • Biases create consistency
                  • Perceptual Bias- expectations of what we think we'll see from others' behavior creates 'consistency' in their behavior
                    • person tells you a girl is quiet, you talk a lot and she doesn't


                  • Sampling Bias - people are constricted by societal setting
                    • ex: librarian = quiet introvert


              • 3 Camps in Response to Mischel
                • Defend Traits
                • Situationism
                • Dynamic Interactionism


              • Defend Traits
                • +.30 still important
                  • predictions in which small correlations matter e.g. medicine,elections
                  • experimental drug example ( higher chance of living but may cause death)


                • Aggregation- needed for high correlations between traits and behaviors
                  • diary study
                    • people reported on own behavior for two weeks
                    • good predictor
                  • multiple choice exams
                    • number of choices allows aggregating to bring whole answer together


                • Phenotype/Genotype Distinction -outward behavior different, underlying purpose same
                  • phenotype= outward behavior
                  • genotype = inward behavior, underlying purpose
                  • Brownie example: politeness = genotype accept/decline= phenotype scenario one: full but want to show you like it scenario two: hungry but last one left so decline


                • Some People are Consistent, Others are Not
                  • High-self Monitors- conform to situation


                  • Low-self Monitors- be true to self


              • Situationism
                • situation = primary cause of behavior
                  • situation produces behavior not anything internal
              • Dynamic Interactionism
                • change/select/manipulate environment in consistent way
                • situations have effect because personality affected situation
                • 3 types
                  • Proactive- select self into situation intentionally for best comfort
                    • choose environment: job to work in, party to go to 


                  • Evocative- change situation by presence unintentionally 
                    • evoke trait-relevant behavior from people in environment by mere presence


                  • Manipulation- self manipulates situation intentionally
                    • ex: walk into quiet roommate's apartment and turn up music and lights manipulating situation


                • The Big Five(and facets) - Trait theory (O.C.E.A.N.)
                  • Extraversion
                    • Sociable- Retiring
                    • Fun loving- Sober
                    • Affectionate- Reserved
                    • Friendly- Aloof
                    • Spontaneous- Inhibited
                    • Talkative - Quiet
                  • Neuroticism
                    • Worrying- Calm
                    • Nervous- At ease
                    • High-strung - Relaxed
                    • Insecure- Secure
                    • Self-Pitying - Self-satisfied
                    • Vulnerable- Hardy
                  • Openness to Experience
                    • Original- Conventional
                    • Imaginative- Down to earth
                    • Creative- Uncreative
                    • Broad interests- Narrow interests
                    • Complex- Simple
                    • Curious - Incurious
                  • Agreeableness
                    • Good natured- Irritable
                    • Soft hearted- Ruthless
                    • Courteous - Rude
                    • Forgiving - Vengeful
                    • Sympathetic - Callous
                    • Agreeable - Disagreeable
                  • Conscientiousness
                    • Conscientious - Negligent
                    • Careful- Careless
                    • Reliable- Undependable
                    • Well-organized - Disorganized
                    • Self-disciplined - Weak-willed
                    • Persevering - Quitting 
              • Big 2
                • Introversion- Extroversion
                • Stability- Instability
                • Implicit motive
                  • unconscious need
                  • more stable and consistent
                • Self-attributed motive
                  • conscious need
                  • immediate responses to socially constructed situations
              • Body Consciousness
                • High score
                  • indicates correlation between knowing implicit and self-attributed motives
                  • you can self-report the implicit, non-conscious, motives accurately

                • Need/Motive: Strength and Weakness
                  • Strength
                    • addresses WHY
                    • deeper explanations
                  • Weakness
                    • not very comprehensive
                    • much room for additional research
                • Exam notes
                  • 20/21 MC 3 points
                  • 10/11 Fill in the Blanks 2 points
                  • 8/9 Short Answers 2.5 points
                  • Lectures
                    • ANYTHING GOES
                  • Textbook
                    • Definitions at end of chapter AND Context it's used in
                  • Names are Important
                  • NOT ON EXAM
                    • Dates
                    • Freud material in Chapter 8
                  • Location
                    • @Classroom @ class time